A video Mash-Up/Re-Mix, of the Eminem Ipod TV ad. We replaced Eminem with Iraq war images, and added new lyrics to the instrumental version of 'Loose Yourself'. The clip was inspired by ForkScrew's 'Iraq' posters.
Google PageRank is only objective way here. It works. Use PageRank.
Scale shows who is popular and who is not. Why criticizing?
Google has great reputation.
I'
How the hell you gonna have 2 entries get to the top 10. If you're gonna cheat your votes, at least don't hog all the spots.
This is humiliating, this guy isn't even for Obama, what the hell is he doing here? If I were Cinemocracy I would disqualify these two cheated entries right away. Or they could wait until both entries get 1000+ votes at the last moment, whichever comes first.
-_-
There are so many films here that are good, $2.27, Outcast, Raising Republic. I can't stand to see these two cheated submissions any longer! They are terrible!
That's a pretty big accusation. subMedia has large following and they have been heavily promoting Cinemocracy on their site, on their email list, youtube, facebook and myspace. Why couldn't they subMit two entries? And why does this have to be about Obama? Isn't this about Democracy after all?
This anonymous pagerank person needs to give it a rest. Maybe you should focus on being better at what you do instead of pointing out the nonexistent flaws of others.
I <3 the stimulator and you should too. http://submedia.tv/
If you have installed in your computer Google ToolBar you'll see that Google PageRank indicated: this film has not enough viewers & raised very small interest.
Google toolbar indicates level of importance of our web sites. At this film's page Google PageRank scale is dead. It means that no visitors - fake success like several other films that have large voting results for some reason. Even average here is 4.5, and over 400 votes,film doesn't have enough viewers to bring Google PageRank alive.
Again: No one can cheat Google - power of technology.
ps There're some films that have high Google ranking here...
Google Page Rank measures the number of incoming links to a page. Therefore it is NOT an accurate measure of interest or the number of actual views a page gets. It is ONLY a measure of the number of websites that link to that specific page. Anyone can manipulate Page Rank by spreading links to a page across a wide selection of websites, forum, comment boards etc.
ALSO, many accomplished filmmakers have extensive email lists and databases through which they promote their work. Email links will not be counted by Page Rank. Your hypothesis is ill informed.
If you have installed in your computer Google ToolBar you'll see that Google PageRank indicated: this film has not enough viewers & raised very small interest.
Google toolbar indicates level of importance of our web sites. At this film's page Google PageRank scale is dead. It means that no visitors - fake success like several other films that have large voting results for some reason. Even average here is 4.5, and over 400 votes,film doesn't have enough viewers to bring Google PageRank alive.
Again: No one can cheat Google - power of technology.
ps There're some films that have high Google ranking here...
What the hell? Who cares? Why would you spend your time telling people that what they are enjoying in irrelevant? Who do you think you are, Sidney Gottlieb? haha
Neat trailer! Where can we see the full project? These filmmakers have a lot of potential, and I look forward to seeing what they can do in a few years.
Frank Lopez has his finger on the pulse of the movement and moves us foward with him using pop culture images mashed up with the TRUTH.. The work of Lopez (SubMedia) is a gasp of oxygen in the vacuum of common sense called media in America in 2008.
Comments
Google PageRank is only
Submitted on August 14th, 2008 by AnonymousGoogle PageRank is only objective way here. It works. Use PageRank.
Scale shows who is popular and who is not. Why criticizing?
Google has great reputation.
I'
How the hell you gonna have
Submitted on August 14th, 2008 by AnonymousHow the hell you gonna have 2 entries get to the top 10. If you're gonna cheat your votes, at least don't hog all the spots.
This is humiliating, this guy isn't even for Obama, what the hell is he doing here? If I were Cinemocracy I would disqualify these two cheated entries right away. Or they could wait until both entries get 1000+ votes at the last moment, whichever comes first.
-_-
There are so many films here that are good, $2.27, Outcast, Raising Republic. I can't stand to see these two cheated submissions any longer! They are terrible!
Screw you AND Obama
Submitted on September 6th, 2008 by AnonymousScrew you AND Obama
That's a pretty big
Submitted on August 14th, 2008 by AnonymousThat's a pretty big accusation. subMedia has large following and they have been heavily promoting Cinemocracy on their site, on their email list, youtube, facebook and myspace. Why couldn't they subMit two entries? And why does this have to be about Obama? Isn't this about Democracy after all?
This anonymous pagerank
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousThis anonymous pagerank person needs to give it a rest. Maybe you should focus on being better at what you do instead of pointing out the nonexistent flaws of others.
I <3 the stimulator and you should too. http://submedia.tv/
If you have installed in
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousIf you have installed in your computer Google ToolBar you'll see that Google PageRank indicated: this film has not enough viewers & raised very small interest.
Google toolbar indicates level of importance of our web sites. At this film's page Google PageRank scale is dead. It means that no visitors - fake success like several other films that have large voting results for some reason. Even average here is 4.5, and over 400 votes,film doesn't have enough viewers to bring Google PageRank alive.
Again: No one can cheat Google - power of technology.
ps There're some films that have high Google ranking here...
If You Installed a Brain,
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousIf You Installed a Brain, You'd be Dangerous.
Page Rank counts weblinks pointed to a URL. It doesn't count viewers and there are other ways to drive traffic to a page.
Bad Logic Google Page Rank
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousBad Logic
Google Page Rank measures the number of incoming links to a page. Therefore it is NOT an accurate measure of interest or the number of actual views a page gets. It is ONLY a measure of the number of websites that link to that specific page. Anyone can manipulate Page Rank by spreading links to a page across a wide selection of websites, forum, comment boards etc.
ALSO, many accomplished filmmakers have extensive email lists and databases through which they promote their work. Email links will not be counted by Page Rank. Your hypothesis is ill informed.
If you have installed in
Submitted on August 2nd, 2008 by AnonymousIf you have installed in your computer Google ToolBar you'll see that Google PageRank indicated: this film has not enough viewers & raised very small interest.
Google toolbar indicates level of importance of our web sites. At this film's page Google PageRank scale is dead. It means that no visitors - fake success like several other films that have large voting results for some reason. Even average here is 4.5, and over 400 votes,film doesn't have enough viewers to bring Google PageRank alive.
Again: No one can cheat Google - power of technology.
ps There're some films that have high Google ranking here...
What the hell? Who cares?
Submitted on August 13th, 2008 by AnonymousWhat the hell? Who cares? Why would you spend your time telling people that what they are enjoying in irrelevant? Who do you think you are, Sidney Gottlieb? haha
Find a hobby and quit sucking Google's dick!
SDK
Excellent work!
Submitted on August 1st, 2008 by AnonymousExcellent work!
awesome as usual - but too
Submitted on August 1st, 2008 by Anonymousawesome as usual - but too short :P
Always great videos! Always
Submitted on July 31st, 2008 by AnonymousAlways great videos! Always informative!
Neat trailer! Where can we
Submitted on July 30th, 2008 by AnonymousNeat trailer! Where can we see the full project? These filmmakers have a lot of potential, and I look forward to seeing what they can do in a few years.
as usual, submedia tells it
Submitted on July 29th, 2008 by Anonymousas usual, submedia tells it like it is. well done.
too much of oxigent is not
Submitted on July 28th, 2008 by Anonymoustoo much of oxigent is not good too. poor
Frank Lopez has his finger
Submitted on July 28th, 2008 by AnonymousFrank Lopez has his finger on the pulse of the movement and moves us foward with him using pop culture images mashed up with the TRUTH.. The work of Lopez (SubMedia) is a gasp of oxygen in the vacuum of common sense called media in America in 2008.
just nothin, poor
Submitted on July 26th, 2008 by Anonymousjust nothin, poor
Great job... Very well done!
Submitted on July 22nd, 2008 by AnonymousGreat job... Very well done!
poor
Submitted on July 22nd, 2008 by Anonymouspoor
poor
Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by Anonymouspoor
It's clear who has the
Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by AnonymousIt's clear who has the professional submission in this contest, its Franklin Lopez. Hats off.
Poor
Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by AnonymousPoor
Who is this anonymous "poor"
Submitted on July 23rd, 2008 by AnonymousWho is this anonymous "poor" person who votes folks down without saying anything of substance in critique? Too bad -- stick to it Franklin!!
This is an awesome video!
Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by AnonymousThis is an awesome video! It's so visually amazing and the content is very thought provoking.
I love it.
Submitted on July 21st, 2008 by AnonymousI love it.
great job!
Submitted on July 20th, 2008 by Anonymousgreat job!